360 degree feedback your leaders will act on
A flexible suite of assessments that helps you screen fairly, select confidently, and onboard faster, whether you are filling one leadership seat or ten thousand seasonal roles.
THE ORGANIZATIONS THAT ASSESS WITH US
Why most 360 degree feedback goes nowhere
Not because the data is wrong. Because nobody asked what the leader was supposed to do with it.
Five views, not one
Self, manager, peers, direct reports and anyone else whose view matters. The gap between how a leader sees themselves and how their team does is the whole conversation, and it is the part a performance review never surfaces.
Ten minutes per rater
Long questionnaires are why 360 programs quietly die: raters stop responding and the data thins out. Ten minutes is short enough that people finish it and honest enough that the result means something.
- No implementation project needed
- Launch a campaign the same day
- Start inviting candidates immediately
Benchmarked outside your walls
Ratings are compared against an external benchmark as well as internal ones. A culture that rates everyone generously cannot hide a problem, and a demanding one cannot manufacture a crisis.
Two reads,
written for two different readers
For the leader
Their eight clearest strengths and their eight biggest challenge areas, each with practical advice rather than a score and a shrug, plus guidance across twenty more behaviors and a development plan they can edit and own. .
For whoever runs the development
The fuller read: numbers and written comments side by side, benchmarked internally and externally, so a coach or an HR lead can see the pattern across a cohort as well as the person in front of them.
See what your leaders would get
Book a demo and we will walk you through a real report structure, the rater experience, and what a debrief actually sounds like. Most people who run 360s have seen the questionnaire before. The part worth ten minutes of your time is what happens after it.
The report is not the intervention
A 360 changes behavior when someone sits down and talks it through. That is the step most programs skip and the one we plan for from the start.
We run the debrief
Or your people do
Train your own team to interpret and deliver it, and the capability stays in the building. That is usually the right answer once 360s are running at any scale.
Where a 360 leadership tool earns its place
Leadership programs
As the opening diagnostic and again at the end, so the program has a before and an after rather than a feeling.
Alongside a behavioral read
How a leader is experienced, set against how they are wired. Two different questions, and the answers are more useful together.
Development at scale
Cohort-level patterns tell you what to build a program around, rather than guessing which module the group needs.
360 degree feedback collects ratings on how someone works from the people around them: their manager, their peers, the people who report to them, and anyone else whose view matters, alongside the person's own rating of themselves. The value sits in the gap between how they see themselves and how everyone else does.
Yes. You set up the review, choose the raters and track completion on the platform, and reports generate as soon as the responses are in. You can run it entirely in-house once your team is trained, or we can run it for you.
Five rater groups are available and you decide which apply: self, manager, peers, direct reports and other stakeholders. More raters in a group means more honest aggregate data and better anonymity, and we will tell you the minimum worth running rather than letting a thin group produce a misleading report.
To interpret and deliver the results, yes, and that is deliberate: feedback handed over without a conversation is how 360s get a bad name. Either our psychologists run the debrief, or we accredit your team to do it.
Yes. The questionnaire can be mapped to your organization's framework so the feedback comes back in the language your leaders already use, rather than in ours.
Tell us who you are developing
The group, the program and what you want to be different at the end of it