Talent management evaluation that checks the decisions
Find out whether your hiring, development and promotion decisions are aimed at the right people, with evidence you can show the board.
TRUSTED BY TOP ORGANIZATIONS ACROSS THE GLOBE
What your evaluation should find
Aim hiring and development with stronger evidence and the return shows up in the numbers you already track.
1 in 5 → 1 in 50
Odds of a serious hiring mistake, before and with Saville
4x
Development that lands, against the average assessment tool
Sources: Project Epsom, Saville et al. (hiring); Saville ROI model estimate (development).
How to run a talent management evaluation
Check the decisions first, then what they produced.
Check the aim
Know your hiring, development and internal moves are aimed at the right people before you judge results. That takes consistent evidence on each person, which is our specialty.
Record the start
Before a program or move begins, record why each person was chosen and how they compared with everyone else assessed. That record is your baseline.
Track the results
Follow what your HR system already holds: early leavers among new hires, critical roles filled internally, and regretted leavers among the people you developed.
Price the result
Set the cost of each internal fill against the cost of hiring externally. The ROI calculator gives you a starting figure for that comparison.
Why evaluations stall
Wrong people chosen
We estimate two in three on a nomination-based high potential program are not high potential. With Saville, one in five.
- Strong retention can flatter the list
- Nobody reports who was missed
- The cost shows when someone leaves
Reasons never recorded
A calibration meeting settles the list, but the reasons rarely get written down. A year later there is nothing to check against.
- Standards drift between business units
- Decisions are hard to justify
- Each review restarts from opinion
Only activity measured
Reviews completed and places filled show the process ran. They say little about whether it picked people who would deliver.
- Completion rates are easy to report
- List accuracy rarely gets measured
- Spend grows without a quality check
Source: Saville ROI model estimate.
The evidence your next evaluation will need
Evidence gathered when each decision is made, so there is something real to evaluate later.
One standard for everyone
Everyone in scope completes the same behavioral assessment, so a person from a quiet team is read on the same evidence as a familiar name.
The whole bench
The Leadership Potential Dashboard shows potential at organizational and divisional level, read on demand rather than once a year.
A record of why
Each decision sits next to the evidence it was based on, so a panel, an auditor or next year’s review can see why someone was chosen.
Results where you work
Results flow into the HR system you already use, next to the outcomes it already tracks, so nobody keeps a second spreadsheet.
Put a figure on a better list
Use your own headcount and hiring costs. For how the numbers are built, see how we calculate return.
One standard across hiring and development
A global food manufacturer with 17,900 employees in 38 operating companies replaced fragmented assessment with one standard for selection and development, so every talent decision could be read against the same benchmark.
25%
fewer mis-hires against the industry benchmark, at professional and leadership level
€1.3 million
in cost savings
5.7%
lower turnover from development use
Evaluation questions, answered
What buyers ask before they change how talent decisions are checked.
Talent management evaluation is checking whether your talent processes put the right people into the right roles, and what that was worth. It covers the decisions, meaning who was chosen and why, the outcomes, such as moves and retention, and the cost. It sits inside your wider talent mobility planning.
Measure the decisions and the outcomes separately. For decisions: how each person was assessed, and against what standard. For outcomes: early leavers among new hires, critical roles filled internally, regretted leavers among the people you developed, and internal fill cost against external hire cost. For a high potential program, start with how the list was built.
Look for independent evidence that the assessment predicts performance, not only the vendor’s own figures. Wave, the science behind our assessments, scored 27 out of 30 in the British Psychological Society’s independent review across six technical areas. Ask every vendor for their equivalent.
We provide the evidence at the point of decision: who was assessed, against what standard, and why each person was chosen. Your HR system holds what happened next. Read together, the two show whether the program chose well.
A completion can be read for a talent decision where that use was part of what the assessment was set up to do. If it was a hiring assessment for a single role, plan on a fresh one. Talk to us about what you already hold.
See what your talent list is missing
Tell us how your talent review works and we will show you where the evidence runs thin.