Give your client more than a CV to go on
You sell judgment: mandates are won on the strength of a shortlist and held on how the placement works out. We put evidence under both, at volume speed or executive depth, inside the ATS your team already works in.
ASSESSMENT YOUR CLIENTS ALREADY TRUST
How we work with recruitment and search firms
Two ways in, and the questions every firm asks before choosing either.
Volume and RPO
Three thousand applications, no reliable signal, and good people gone before anyone calls them. The screener runs inside the ATS: twelve questions, two minutes on the phone the candidate applied from, and a fit band back on the record with nothing for your team to interpret.
85% of candidates finish it, and the chance of the wrong person reaching a shortlist drops from 1 in 5 to 1 in 14. This one is for your own recruiters: hours back from the pile, faster fills, and a better longlist before a client ever sees it.
Executive and high-stakes search
When the appointment really matters, your client wants more than a CV and a strong interview. Behavior and aptitude are read together against the role: one success indicator per candidate, a recommendation, and the interview guide on the same screen.
At full depth the chance of a mis-hire falls from 1 in 5 to 1 in 50, and your recommendation carries that evidence into the boardroom.
The AI CV problem
AI writes the job description, the CV and the cover letter, and every firm is sifting the same polished applications. So why is this different? Because we never read the CV. A CV has never predicted performance well (0.07 validity at best); the person does.
Candidates rate and rank statements about themselves in a two-minute format built to resist auto-completion, scored by validated science at 0.37 validity rather than by generative AI guessing from a document AI wrote. When a client asks how you handle AI applicants, your process has an answer.
Your brand on the output
Reports can carry your identity, and a consultant can read one in minutes without an accreditation.
Interview guides give your client something to use in the room rather than a score to interpret, and bespoke reporting can map the output to your framework or your client's. The work looks like yours, because it is.
Making it work commercially
Most firms absorb the screener as a recruiting tool and sell the premium assessments on to the client, with their brand on the report.
When a client asks whose assessment you recommend, you get to say the most valid on the market. Pricing is flexible, from pay as you go to licenses, which carry the better margin.
Evidence throughout the hiring process
Find the right person faster, without training your recruiters to be psychometric experts.
Screen at speed
Built for your recruiters: hours back, faster fills.
- A fit band back on the candidate record in seconds, with nothing to interpret
- Two minutes per candidate, and 85% of them finish it
Assess in depth
Insight a CV cannot give you or your client.
- Behavioral and aptitude read together against the role
- At full depth the risk of a bad hire falls from 1 in 5 to 1 in 50
- Success indicator, recommendation and interview guide on one screen, readable in minutes
Personalized to the role
Match people to any role, no psychometric training required.
- An AI role profiler works out the behaviors a role actually needs, then tailors the role-fit score, the success profile and the interview guide to it
- Your consultants place across any function without mapping competencies by hand
From first conversation to first mandate
We build around how you win and deliver work, not the other way round.
STEP 1
Map it to your mandates
Volume, search or both. We map the assessments to how you win and deliver work, and you see exactly what lands where: the fit band your recruiters work from on the screener, and the reports and interview guides your client receives on a search, before anything is signed.
STEP 2
Plug it into the process
Screening runs inside the ATS your recruiters already use. Search consultants read a report in minutes and present it the same day, with your brand on the output where you want it.
STEP 3
Price it for the way you sell
Pricing is flexible, from pay as you go to licenses, which carry the better margin. We shape the model around how you sell, whether you absorb the screener as a recruiting tool or bill assessment on to your client.
The evidence your clients are starting to expect
VIRGIN MONEY
Virgin Money moved hiring across the business onto a structured, evidenced process, so managers could show why each decision was made.
- 7,000+ employees across the business
- One process for hiring, consistent across every team
- Evidenced, every decision against clear selection criteria
We now have a more robust, fairer hiring process, protecting our managers and evidencing our hiring decisions with a clear criteria for selection.
JAGUAR LAND ROVER
Jaguar Land Rover moved high-volume hiring decisions onto assessment evidence, cutting the time from application to decision and the cost of running the process.
- 48 hrs to a hiring decision, down from three weeks
- 70% estimated cost reduction
It helps to ensure the right person is on the shortlist, reducing the risk of a bad hire in a critical role to as little as 1 in 50 with the full assessments. Your recruiters get their hours back from the pile, roles fill faster, and the shortlist you present carries evidence your competitors cannot show.
Almost certainly. Whether your team runs Bullhorn, Oracle Recruiting Cloud or one of 115+ other connected systems, invitations go out from the ATS your recruiters already work in and the fit band lands back on the candidate record, so nobody leaves the workflow. The integrations page has the current list.
Two minutes, twelve questions, on the phone they applied from, and 85% of candidates finish it. It is charged on completion, so a candidate who drops off costs nothing.
Flexibly. Most firms absorb the screener as a recruiting tool and sell the premium assessments on to the client. Pricing runs from pay as you go to licenses, which carry the better margin.
We never read the CV and we do not score people with generative AI. Candidates rate and rank statements about themselves in a format built to resist auto-completion, and the result is scored by science with twenty years of validity evidence behind it. When a client asks how the shortlist was built, the answer stands up.
Independent evidence. The British Psychological Society rated Wave® 27 out of 30 across six technical areas, a third-party review rather than our own claim, and predictive validity (the correlation between assessment score and how someone actually performs in the job) runs from 0.37 on the two-minute screen to 0.57 on the Deep Dive: in practice, the difference between 1 bad hire in 5 and 1 in 50. For the methodology, start with the science behind Wave®.
Tell us about your mandates
Volume, search or both, and the systems your team works in. Tell us and we'll come back with a recommendation.