Article · 4-minute read
By Amber Williams – 27th February 2025
The pressure on today’s leaders has never been greater. The rapid adoption of AI is reshaping the skills that leaders need, while economic uncertainty is making strong leadership even more critical. Organizations face increasing challenges in identifying and developing leaders who can drive success in this evolving landscape.
Making the right hiring and promotion decisions is crucial — not just to ensure business performance, but to avoid costly mistakes. Poor leadership hiring decisions don’t just have direct financial consequences; they can impact an organization’s reputation, lower team morale, and reduce productivity.
With so much at stake, it is vital for organizations to use fair, data-driven leadership assessments that accurately identify leadership impact across cultures.
The modern workplace is more global than ever. With remote work, multinational teams, and increased mobility, leaders must be able to manage and inspire diverse groups across cultures. Even organizations operating within a single country often employ individuals from a variety of cultural backgrounds. This reality raises a critical question: How can organizations fairly and effectively assess leadership across different cultural contexts?
Traditional concerns about personality assessments include whether they truly capture leadership potential across cultures and whether results are consistent when translated into different languages (McCrae, 2002). In addition, behaviors expressed can vary globally. For example, in some cultures, strong assertiveness is seen as a leadership strength, while in others, humility and group harmony are valued more (Hofstede, 1980; HBR, 2016).
Ensuring leadership assessments are both fair and predictive in a global environment is essential. Leadership expectations may vary by region, but organizations need leaders who can operate successfully across cultures. A major challenge is balancing cultural awareness with the need for a universal framework that identifies the most effective leadership behaviors regardless of geography.
We have conducted exploratory analysis using our global leadership assessment data, comparing Leadership Impact scores across some regions which may be considered different culturally, including the UK, US, China, and the GCC. The goal was to understand whether there are meaningful differences in leadership by culture, or whether leadership behaviors and their associated impact remained consistent in the regions included.
Our findings indicate that there were mostly no notable differences between cultures across the Leadership Impact profile. The only point of interest in the different comparisons was that the GCC group were approximately 1.1 Sten higher than the UK group on behaviors relating to new products and markets and managing risk. There were generally no appreciable differences found across cultural groups, which reinforces the idea that leadership assessments can measure universal qualities rather than culturally-specific behaviors.
Our research highlights the importance of focusing on leadership impact rather than more traditional approaches to leadership, or culturally-defined leadership styles. Saville Assessment’s Leadership Impact Model provides a structured way to assess leadership effectiveness by evaluating the tangible impact a leader has in their organization. By focusing on the most predictive behaviors of leadership success, rather than assumptions based on culture, organizations can make data-driven decisions when identifying and developing leaders.
The Leadership Impact Model was developed using extensive international research, ensuring it remains relevant across different business contexts. It captures both broad leadership effectiveness areas and specific leadership styles that individuals may adopt depending on their environment.
Organizations should rely on empirical data rather than cultural assumptions when assessing leadership. While cultural insights can be valuable, it is important to consider leadership effectiveness is often driven by universal behaviors rather than regional leadership stereotypes.
Given the financial and reputational costs associated with leadership selection, organizations must ensure their assessments are both fair and predictive, enabling them to identify and develop the right leaders on a global scale.
It is crucial to focus on what truly matters for the role. Role profiling helps identify where leaders will have the greatest impact, allowing organizations to target identification and development efforts effectively. Aligning leadership assessment with organizational needs increases the chances of selecting the right leaders while honing their strengths and development areas. By pinpointing where leaders will drive the most impact, whether in professional, people, or pioneering leadership, assessment processes can support organizations in achieving their goals.
Get in touch to discuss how our Leadership Impact model can help identify and improve the leadership potential in your organization.
Amber is a Managing Consultant at Saville Assessment. She is a Neurodiversity at Work Expert and has a passion for creating inclusive assessments.
In today’s fast-paced business environment, Talent Acquisition teams are under immense pressure to run efficient recruitment processes and acquire the right skills.
10th Dec, 2024
As generative AI transforms the technological landscape, understanding the impact for psychometric assessments has emerged as a top priority for our industry.
6th Feb, 2025
The traditional 4/5ths rule has long served as a common benchmark for fairness in the application of employment assessments. But should we be doing better than the 4/5ths rule of fairness?
23rd Jan, 2025
© 2025 Saville Assessment. All rights reserved.
